Menu

Tag Archives: Con-Con

HomeTag: Con-Con

Convention of States Chaos | Activate America

Podcast: Play in new window | Download

Some people believe that the best way to “fix” the Constitution is with a Convention of States or Constitutional Convention.  What they don’t realize is who will be elected or appointed to rewrite this document.  Will big money push their candidates into a position to make changes that favor them? 

What about the street organizations fighting to win their influence, protesting and rioting in the streets?

Watch this episode to find out why a Convention of States is such a horrible idea.

Action Items:

  1. Like and share this video with others.
  2. Apply for JBS membership and get involved.
  3. Find out why Glenn Beck has abandoned his support for an Article V Convention.  
  4. To learn more about a Constitutional Convention, watch “A Crash Course on a Constitutional Convention”. 

Conservatives are Being Duped into Destroying the Constitution

Podcast: Play in new window | Download

There exists a deceptive, “conservative”-led movement to open up the U.S. constitution for changes using a method that’s never been tried—by calling an Article V constitutional convention, or Con-Con. The Con-Con is being pitched as the way to save the country, and many well-meaning patriots are being duped into believing it. However, it would do the opposite of saving the country — it would destroy the Constitution, and the United States with it. In this episode, Paul and Christian Gomez, JBS’ Research Project Manager, discuss why a Con-Con is dangerous, the people behind its push, and how to stop it.

Resources & Action Items

Learn about the Con-Con danger

Elect constitutionalists and vote out un-American reps with help from the Congressional Scorecard 

Read “Leftists can rig elections, they certainly can rig a constitutional convention” by the Federalist

See what Dr. Ron Paul has to say about a Con-Con

Join The John Birch Society in the battle to restore America

Leftist Semantic Agenda | Activate America

Podcast: Play in new window | Download

Semantics or the words you choose, have very specific meanings.  One example is how the Media uses “Local Police” and “Law Enforcement” interchangeably.  Even though they seem similar, they are very different. 

Another example of semantics is the Bill of Rights.  When the Founding Fathers created the Bill of Rights, they were very specific in their meaning.  Now there are those that want to change the wording of the Bill of Rights to suit their own goals.

Today, Arthur R. Thompson will illustrate how semantics in these two examples could cause dire consequences.

Action Items:

  1. Like and share this video with others.
  2. Learn more about our action project, “Support Your Local Police and Keep Them Independent”. 
  3. What’s wrong with a Constitutional Convention? 
  4. Apply for JBS membership and get involved.
  5. Sign up for Legislative Action Alerts or text JBS to 800-527-8721
Close
What are you looking for?