MT State Rep. Brad Tschida’s Testimony Against His Own Con-Con Application
MT State Rep. Brad Tschida sponsored a Con-Con application resolution in 2017, but after reflecting on “some new information that came to my attention” he testified in committee against his own resolution on Feb 15, 2017! He said, “I guess we can always do one of two things in these situations. We can staunchly defend why we took the position we did even though we know it's wrong... Or we can admit that we were wrong…”
Rep. Tschida not only did the honorable thing, he tried to persuade other legislators to reject a Con-Con! He correctly stated “that there are more effective ways to curb a problem in Washington, DC than using this measure.” Please share his testimony with your legislators. States that have already passed a Con-Con application can do the honorable thing and help stop a reckless Con-Con by rescinding their application.
For more information visit https://www.jbs.org/con-con
For the full committee hearing:
http://sg001-harmony.sliq.net/00309/Harmony/en/PowerBrowser/PowerBrowserV2?fk=21870#agenda_
Recommended for you
View AllThomas Massie Destroys BBA False Solution
Congressman Thomas Massie (R-Ky.) — one of the few consistent constitutionalists and fiscal conservatives in Congress — delivers a blunt truth bomb about proposed so-called Balanced Budget Amendments (BBAs) to the U.S. Constitution in this December 3, 2025 House Judiciary hearing clip. Representative Massie explains how a BBA to the Constitution would not force Washington to ...
Watch NowHow to Write Strong, Constitutionalist Legislation
In this presentation, JBS Research Associate Peter Rykowski discusses how understanding America’s founding principles are essential to writing legislation properly. By applying the wisdom of our Founding Fathers, we can avoid common — and dangerous — pitfalls and ensure that state legislation soundly advances limited government and individual freedom. ...
Watch Now🎙️Tonight on “Who Wants to Rewrite the Constitution?!”
We’ve got state lawmakers who clearly haven’t read or can’t explain Article V, pitching a never-before-used process with zero rules and infinite bravado. 😎 👍 Not convinced yet? Trust them, they’ve got this down pat. You know like waving an empty gun in Capitol Hill and hoping it scares someone into reading and obeying the ...
Watch NowRep. Hageman: Article V Con-Con is Dangerous!
Congresswoman Harriet Hageman (R-Wyo.), a strict constructionist and constitutionalist, is asked about her position on a constitutional convention, under Article V, to propose changes to the Constitution would be dangerous. “It’s too dangerous. It’s terribly, terribly dangerous. I don’t think that we could control it,” Representative Hageman replies. “My view is how about if we ...
Watch Now
