{"id":148521,"date":"2023-11-16T16:32:58","date_gmt":"2023-11-16T22:32:58","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/jbs.org\/?post_type=jbsvideo&p=148521"},"modified":"2024-02-29T12:43:38","modified_gmt":"2024-02-29T18:43:38","slug":"15-1787-ratification-process-changed","status":"publish","type":"jbsvideo","link":"https:\/\/jbs.org\/video\/understanding-article-v\/15-1787-ratification-process-changed\/","title":{"rendered":"1:5 – 1787: Ratification Process Changed\u00a0"},"content":{"rendered":"\n

Originally, the delegates to the Philadelphia Convention of 1787 were tasked to simply revise, or amend, the Articles of Confederation and to \u201crender,\u201d or make, the then-existing Federal Constitution and the Federal form of government under it \u201cadequate to the exigencies of the Union.\u201d In other words, they were supposed to keep their form of government and improve the Articles of Confederation to meet the needs of the crisis at hand.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

One of the delegates, John Lansing of New York, confirmed how the convention would be limited: \u201c[T]he power of the Convention was restrained to amendments of a Federal nature, and having for their basis the Confederacy in being. The acts of Congress, the tenor of the acts of the States, the commissions produced by the several Deputations, all proved this. [\u2026] it was un-necessary and improper to go further.\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n