That is the most likely reason the security camera tapes recently released by the FBI under a Freedom of Information Act request appear to be doctored.

The official line on the bombing of the Murrah Federal Building in Oklahoma City on April 19th, 1995 is that a couple a guys in a Ryder Rental truck, filled with a backyard brew of fertilzer and fuel oil (ANFO bomb), were able to bring down a major portion of a steel reinforced concrete structure. While that story was being fabricated for mass consumption, investigative reporter Willaim F. Jasper of The New American magazine — flagship publication of The John Birch Society — was digging up the real truth. (Click on cover story photo.)

Jasper called on the expertise of Brigadier General Benton K. Partin (USAF, ret). Partin had spent a career in the military developing ordnance that would get the biggest bang for the buck when it came to destroying things like buildings. Partin's analysis of the blast site and destruction of the Murrah building came down to this:

An ANFO bomb could not have destroyed the structural columns in the Murah building. And, even if military grade explosives were used, a blast in the street could not destroy interior columns while leaving closer more exterior columns intact.  

The conclusion Partin offered was that the Murrah building had most likely been brought down with the use of demolition charges. 

Too shocking to believe? Well, back when The John Birch Society was doing the hard work of fighting for freedom against the tide of cover-ups and lies being put out by the federal government on the OKC bombing, there was not a readily available case study to check Brig. General Partin's analysis against. However, that changed last year with the truck bombing of the Marriott Hotel in Islamabad, Pakistan in September of 2008.

Check the footage of the bomb site in Islamabad and note the following:

1. The bomb crater left in the street is at least as large if not larger than anything you can find for OKC.
2. The explosives used were far more powerful than fertilizer and fuel oil.
3. And the clincher: The massive explosion in Islamabad, as Partin predicted, did not even have enough force to blow out a single thin concrete column holding up the ornamental roof along the sidewalk of the Marriott Hotel.

Here is where an honest reader should give pause and start to question the government line on OKC. For others not willing to face up the the truth they have two options: cover their ears or go through a mental gyration that explains how the laws of physics vary between Oklahoma City and Islamabad. 

Maybe they just don't build federal buildings in the U.S. as strong as sidewalk awnings in Pakistan?

TrackBack URI for this entry

Comments (3)

Subscribe to this comment's feed

Show/Hide comments

Jim Bowman Jr. said:

Oklahoma City complicity Having read the exhaustive and detailed investigative reports written by William Jasper, in which Gen. Partin's analysis "seals the deal," two factors must be remedied. First, these facts are just not getting the proper amount of public exposure. Secondly, many just plain refuse to believe that our government could do anything so horrible. To answer both, the first impediment is being dealt with as more people become curious and start to question. Eventually, TNA numbers must go off the charts, if only based upon the truth available and reported within. People talk and word of mouth is the best endorsement. Secondly, to those who refuse to consider governmental complicity with such a horrible loss of life, I say, look at Vietnam! Washington closed up shop non-chalantly after almost 60,000 Americans died believing LBJ's "line in the sand" declarations. Washington's record speaks for itself. In closing, I say that the Oklahoma City evidence is so overwhelmingly indictable, that to deny the obvious is as threatening as it is an act of public compliciity! Regards, Jim Bowman Jr. Ormond Beach, Fl.

report abuse vote down vote up

October 23, 2009
Votes: +3

Pat Henry said:

Call 9-11! The Twin Towers pancaking demolition (free fall speed requires resistance knocked out ahead of time) provides another case study in both demolition and "government line", for those willing to look at the evidence (and overlook the leftist solutions of many of those parading the evidence). Physics do not lie, and molten steel underground does not come from jet fuel burning out far above. Etc., etc. It is time for real change, not just a change of rhetoric or faces. This can still be done peacefully, but it requires courage at the ballot box, and by lower magistrates (States and counties). And a lot of serious prayer. I am delighted to say that after praying and learning (and acting) for many years about "what's going on," I found The New American to already have been publishing along the same lines. I am now more committed than ever to Constitutional government and libertarian economics, and encourage anyone reading this to, as I did a couple years ago, get a test subscription for a Christmas present to self.

report abuse vote down vote up

November 25, 2009
Votes: +3

Pat Henry said:

... Yes, if these things are true, the net of individuals involved is enormous. People close their eyes in reaction rather than face even the possibility. Our enemies count on this Machiavellian tactic to work (shock and awe). I stand with a true "USA Patriot" who helped encourage against all odds in the past, to trust the aid of heaven for assistance in a righteous cause: "Mr. President, it is natural to man to indulge in the illusions of hope. We are apt to shut our eyes against a painful truth, and listen to the song of that siren till she transforms us into beasts. Is this the part of wise men, engaged in a great and arduous struggle for liberty? Are we disposed to be of the numbers of those who, having eyes, see not, and, having ears, hear not, the things which so nearly concern their temporal salvation? For my part, whatever anguish of spirit it may cost, I am willing to know the whole truth, to know the worst, and to provide for it." Thankfully, there are greater weapons than those of carnal violence. I refer to spiritual ones. I believe that in this day in which many sacrifices to demonic powers are involved in (and behind) high places, the only place of true victory will be to "legislate in the heavenlies" first of all. The first petition, after all, is Thy Kingdom come; and it is a spiritual Kingdom, not like the sword of the earthly. We have before us an even finer moment in history than the many to whom we are grateful for heroism in past carnal conflicts (and without diminishing their value). As it says on the welcome desk in Ron Paul's office: "PRAY"!

report abuse vote down vote up

November 25, 2009
Votes: +2