That is the most likely reason the security camera tapes recently released by the FBI under a Freedom of Information Act request appear to be doctored.

The official line on the bombing of the Murrah Federal Building in Oklahoma City on April 19th, 1995 is that a couple a guys in a Ryder Rental truck, filled with a backyard brew of fertilzer and fuel oil (ANFO bomb), were able to bring down a major portion of a steel reinforced concrete structure. While that story was being fabricated for mass consumption, investigative reporter Willaim F. Jasper of The New American magazine — flagship publication of The John Birch Society — was digging up the real truth. (Click on cover story photo.)

Jasper called on the expertise of Brigadier General Benton K. Partin (USAF, ret). Partin had spent a career in the military developing ordnance that would get the biggest bang for the buck when it came to destroying things like buildings. Partin's analysis of the blast site and destruction of the Murrah building came down to this:

An ANFO bomb could not have destroyed the structural columns in the Murah building. And, even if military grade explosives were used, a blast in the street could not destroy interior columns while leaving closer more exterior columns intact.  

The conclusion Partin offered was that the Murrah building had most likely been brought down with the use of demolition charges. 

Too shocking to believe? Well, back when The John Birch Society was doing the hard work of fighting for freedom against the tide of cover-ups and lies being put out by the federal government on the OKC bombing, there was not a readily available case study to check Brig. General Partin's analysis against. However, that changed last year with the truck bombing of the Marriott Hotel in Islamabad, Pakistan in September of 2008.

Check the footage of the bomb site in Islamabad and note the following:

1. The bomb crater left in the street is at least as large if not larger than anything you can find for OKC.
2. The explosives used were far more powerful than fertilizer and fuel oil.
3. And the clincher: The massive explosion in Islamabad, as Partin predicted, did not even have enough force to blow out a single thin concrete column holding up the ornamental roof along the sidewalk of the Marriott Hotel.

Here is where an honest reader should give pause and start to question the government line on OKC. For others not willing to face up the the truth they have two options: cover their ears or go through a mental gyration that explains how the laws of physics vary between Oklahoma City and Islamabad. 

Maybe they just don't build federal buildings in the U.S. as strong as sidewalk awnings in Pakistan?

TrackBack URI for this entry

Comments (1)

Subscribe to this comment's feed

Show/Hide comments

Jim Bowman Jr. said:

Oklahoma City complicity Having read the exhaustive and detailed investigative reports written by William Jasper, in which Gen. Partin's analysis "seals the deal," two factors must be remedied. First, these facts are just not getting the proper amount of public exposure. Secondly, many just plain refuse to believe that our government could do anything so horrible. To answer both, the first impediment is being dealt with as more people become curious and start to question. Eventually, TNA numbers must go off the charts, if only based upon the truth available and reported within. People talk and word of mouth is the best endorsement. Secondly, to those who refuse to consider governmental complicity with such a horrible loss of life, I say, look at Vietnam! Washington closed up shop non-chalantly after almost 60,000 Americans died believing LBJ's "line in the sand" declarations. Washington's record speaks for itself. In closing, I say that the Oklahoma City evidence is so overwhelmingly indictable, that to deny the obvious is as threatening as it is an act of public compliciity! Regards, Jim Bowman Jr. Ormond Beach, Fl.

report abuse vote down vote up

October 23, 2009
Votes: +0