Sixteen years ago, President Bill Clinton returned to Oxford University for what The New York Times (6/9/94) called “a sentimental journey to the university where he didn’t inhale, didn’t get drafted and didn’t get a degree.” The Times article went on:

The last got rectified by Oxford University in a ceremony conducted by men in black gowns speaking Latin in a 325-year-old stone building designed by Christopher Wren. Mr. Clinton, who studied politics at University College as a Rhodes Scholar from the fall of 1968 to the spring of 1970, was awarded an honorary doctorate in civil law.

He was given the award for being “a doughty and tireless champion of the cause of world peace.” His wife, Hillary Rodham Clinton, was given a claret jug with a Latin inscription hailing her as “the Lady in charge of Universal Health.” After the ceremony, Clinton walked around the University grounds with his old Oxford roommate, Robert Reich, who became his Secretary of Labor.

The Times article then reminded us that it was at Oxford that Clinton was able to ride out the Vietnam War. And it was also at Oxford that Clinton wrote his infamous letter to the commander of the Reserve Officer Training Corps in Arkansas, thanking him for saving him from the draft. He said: “I am writing too in the hope that my telling this one story will help you to understand more clearly how so many fine people have come to find themselves still loving their country but loathing the military.”

Rhodes Scholarship: Fast Way to the Top
Obviously, a lot of people who voted for Clinton thought he was just a good old boy from a backward Southern state who wouldn’t do much harm in the White House and would certainly not promote socialism. But the simple fact is that Clinton had been on the high road to Establishment power since his days at Georgetown where his history professor, Carroll Quigley, wrote the book on how to become one of the Establishment Insiders. Becoming a Rhodes Scholar was the fastest way to the top.

According to Quigley, all of this started in 1870 with the appointment of John Ruskin as professor of fine arts at Oxford. Ruskin spoke to his students as members of the privileged ruling class, in possession of “a magnificent tradition of education, beauty, rule of law, freedom, decency, and self-discipline but that this tradition could not be saved…unless it could be extended to the lower classes in England itself and to the non-English masses throughout the world.”

Ruskin Inspires Cecil Rhodes
One of the undergraduates who was greatly moved and inspired by Ruskin’s philosophy was Cecil Rhodes (1853-1902) who later became world famous for exploiting the diamond and gold fields of South Africa. By the 1890s, Rhodes had a personal income of at least a million pounds sterling a year, most of which he spent promoting the idea of creating a federation of English-speaking peoples to bring the world under their benign control. For this purpose Rhodes left part of his great fortune to found the Rhodes Scholarships at Oxford in order to spread the English ruling class tradition throughout the English-speaking world as Ruskin had wanted.

The Idea of a Secret Society
It was a journalist, William T. Stead, who brought Ruskin’s disciples at Oxford into association with Rhodes, which resulted in the formation of a secret society on February 5, 1891, which Rhodes had been dreaming about for sixteen years. Quigley writes in Tragedy and Hope:

In this secret society Rhodes was to be leader; Stead, Brett (Lord Escher), and [Alfred] Milner were to form an executive committee; Arthur (Lord) Balfour, (Sir) Harry Johnston, Lord Rothschild, Albert (Lord) Grey, and others were listed as potential members of a “Circle of Initiates”; while there was to be an outer circle known as the “Association of helpers” (later organized by Milner as the Round Table organization)….Thus the central part of the secret society was established by March 1891.…This group was able to get access to Rhodes’s money after his death in 1902.

The New York Times Reveals All
Rhodes died on March 26, 1902 in South Africa. On April 9, 1902, The New York Times published the following story on its front page:

Mr. Rhodes’s Ideal of Anglo-Saxon Greatness

Statement of His Aims, Written for W. T. Stead in 1890

He Believed a Wealthy Secret Society

Should Work to Secure the World’s Peace

And a British-American Federation

London, April 9.--An article on the Right Hon. Cecil J. Rhodes, by William T. Stead, will appear in the forthcoming number of The American Review of Reviews. The article, excerpts from which follow, consists of a frank, powerful explanation of Mr. Rhodes’s views on America and Great Britain, and for the first time sets forth his own inmost aims….

In its three columns of complex sentences the whole of Mr. Rhodes’s international and individual philosophy is embraced. Perhaps it can best be summarized as an argument in favor of the organization of a secret society, on the lines of the Jesuit order, for the promotion of the peace and welfare of the world, and the establishment of an American-British federation, with absolute home rule for the component parts….

But toward securing this millenium Mr. Rhodes believed the most important factor would be “a secret society, organized like Loyola’s, supported by the accumulated wealth of those whose aspiration is a desire to do something,” and who would be spared the “hideous annoyance” daily created by the thought to which “of their incompetent relations” they should leave their fortunes. These wealthy people, Mr. Rhodes thought, would thus be greatly relieved and be able to turn “their ill-gotten or inherited gains to some advantage.”…

“Fancy,” Mr. Rhodes goes on to say, “the charm to Young America, just coming on, and dissatisfied, for they have filled up their own country and do not know what to tackle next, to share in a scheme to take the government of the whole world.”…

“What scope! What a horizon of work for the next two centuries for the best energies of the best people in the world!”

Enlisting the Wealth of the Rich
Rhodes knew instinctively that only by controlling the wealth of the world could his ambitious scheme become a reality. That meant bringing the rich into the plan to initially finance the scheme, and then gain control of the world’s economy. The great foundations — Carnegie, Rockefeller, Ford, etc. — have been promoting world government for decades, and many multinational corporations have also become part of the scheme.

The income tax, enacted in 1912, has drained the general population of the cash needed to organize any significant opposition to the New World Order. It was also needed to replace tariffs as the federal government’s chief source of revenue. Rhodes believed in free trade, and that is why the Internationalists have pushed through GATT, NAFTA, and the WTO as necessary steps toward world government.

The Rhodes Scharships
It was in his last will and testament that Rhodes outlined his plan for the Rhodes Scholarships. They have become the main instrument whereby the most promising young people throughout the English-speaking world could be recruited to serve an idea that Rhodes thought would take 200 years to fulfill.

As Carroll Quigley wrote in The Anglo-American Establishment (p.33): “The scholarships were merely a façade to conceal the secret society, or, more accurately they were to be one of the instruments by which the members of the secret society could carry out his purpose.”

Obviously, the way the secret society would recruit its future leaders from among the Rhodes scholars was to dangle before them the prospects of future advancement in whatever field they chose to pursue, be it education, politics, government, foundation work, finance, journalism, etc. The road to fame and fortune was open as long as you played the game and obeyed the rules. In 1994, the Association of American Rhodes Scholars had an alumni membership of about 1,600. Today, it is obviously much larger.

Some Prominent American Rhodies
Here is a short list of American Rhodes scholars who have achieved great success. They include J. William Fulbright (1925) U.S. Senator from Arkansas; Daniel J. Boorstin (1934) Librarian of Congress; Walt W. Rostow (1936) National Security adviser; Byron R. White (1938) Supreme Court Justice; Nicholas Katzenbach (1947) U.S. Attorney General; Stansfield Turner (1947) Director of the CIA; Guido Calabresi (1953) Dean of Yale Law School; Neil Rudenstine (1956) President of Harvard; Jonathan Kozol (1958) left-wing author; Lester Thurow (1960) liberal economist, Dean of Sloan School at MIT; David Souter (1961) U.S. Supreme Court Justice; David Boren (1963) U.S. Senator; Richard Lugar (1954) U.S. Senator; Paul Sarbanes (1954) U.S. Senator; Bill Bradley (1965) U.S. Senator; Robert Reich (1968) Secretary of Labor in the Clinton administration; George Stephanopoulos (1984) Clinton’s White House Spokesman, later ABC News commentator; Thomas F. Birmingham (1972) Massachusetts State Senator, sponsor of an education reform bill.

Professor Quigley’s Prophetic Words
Clinton’s Georgetown professor, Carroll Quigley, died in 1977. His second book, The Anglo-American Establishment, was published posthumously in 1981. In it he wrote:

No country that values its safety should allow what the Milner group accomplished--that is, that a small number of men would be able to wield such power in administration and politics, should be given almost complete control over the publication of documents relating to their actions, should be able to exercise such influence over the avenues of information that create public opinion, and should be able to monopolize so completely the writing and the teaching of the history of their own period.

But neither Quigley nor anyone else could have foreseen the development of the Internet and the creation of great new avenues of information that have made it possible for everyone with a computer to search for truth. Just as Rhodesia has become Zimbabwe, so has Rhodes’s secret society been exposed for what it is, a misguided utopian attempt at world government which will fail because it is so contrary to human nature.

Today, the government in Washington is run by a Chicago mob of corrupt leftist politicians who believe in total government, and the Western world is at war with Islamist extremists determined to impose an Islamic Caliphate over the entire world. And the England of Oxford University is slowly surrendering its democratic heritage and traditions to the Moslem immigrants who will not adopt Western Judeo-Christian values. Yet, every year bright students from the Western world will be selected for these prestigious scholarships, so that Cecil Rhodes’s delusional dreams can be perpetuated.

Dr. Samuel L. Blumenfeld is the author of nine books on education including NEA: Trojan Horse in American Education, The Whole Language/OBE Fraud, and The Victims of Dick & Jane and Other Essays. Of NEA: Trojan Horse in American Education, former U.S. Senator Steve Symms of Idaho said: “Every so often a book is written that can change the thinking of a nation. This book is one of them.” Mr. Blumenfeld’s columns have appeared in such diverse publications as Reason, The New American, The Chalcedon Report, Insight, Education Digest, Vital Speeches, WorldNetDaily, and others.

TrackBack URI for this entry

Comments (29)

Subscribe to this comment's feed

Show/Hide comments

DDW said:

	Ahh, but There is no such thing as a conspiracy, ha? Right. And I have a bridge in Brooklyn to sell you if you believe that there is no conspiracy.
	report abuse vote down vote up

February 02, 2010
Votes: +1

SCHNORCHEL said:

Clinton's unerring TREASON The corrupt Bill Clinton is exposed herein as the recondite INSIDER. His Rhodes Scholarship connection pulls up one of the tap-roots to the INSIDERS. His life has been filled with high crimes and treason, and yet the INSIDERS have seen fit to have Bill protected and furthered. I still remember his connection to Bernie Schwartz of Loral to improve the Communist Chinese "Long March" ICBM to make it workable. I remember the Chinagate scandal with Johnny Chung in which coal mines in Utah were shut down so that coal could be shipped in from Indonesia, in exchange for Communist China funding Clinton's re-election campaign. None of these caused any harm to Bill Clinton, because he is a member of the Council on Foreign Relations. Even the John Birch Society's "Impeach Clinton" campaign made only a slight dent into Clinton's ever-rising climb to power, showing the power of the INSIDER CONSPIRACY that has supported Bill for decades.

report abuse vote down vote up

February 02, 2010
Votes: +3

Oxford Joe said:

... What a convincingly written article. I lived in Oxford for a time - and even occasionally went into the Rhodes office - and never imagined that such dastardly deeds were at hand all around me. Wait until I tell my friends at Oxford that "Oxford University is slowly surrendering its democratic heritage and traditions". They will be shocked and surprised. I am so glad we now have the internet so that thoughtful, logical, well-reasoned articles like this can be circulated around the world. But how can we be sure that the bad guys aren't watching us...right now...breathing down our necks...wait, I think someone is trying to... [message ends]

report abuse vote down vote up

February 03, 2010
Votes: -1

Lee Gonzales said:

	Oxford Joe can't even tie his own bow tie and he's going to refute Sam Blumenfeld with a silly attempt at sarcasm? Sure you lived in Oxford "for a while," and sure you have "friends at Oxford."
	report abuse vote down vote up

February 03, 2010
Votes: +0

Oxford Joe said:

... Ah, Lee Gonzales, the things I could tell you about Queens Lane and the Bridge of Sighs and punts along the Cherwell and Summer VIIIs and the flowers in the back gardens of Magdalen in springtime. Of course I spent time in Oxford. Try to find anyone at Oxford who's a member of John Birch. You'll be looking for a while. How are things in your mountain log cabin, by the way? Good luck polishing your guns. (By the way, most people in Oxford don't tie their own bow-ties. The white ties which are sold at shops on the High St and on Turl St are generally pre-tied.)

report abuse vote down vote up

February 03, 2010
Votes: -3

Lee Gonzales said:

Oxford flunkies "Try to find anyone at Oxford who's a member of John Birch. You'll be looking for a while" Oxford Willy, don't you realize that to post on this site you have to join up? This is a John Birch Society offical site. So if it's true that you attended Oxford, and technically you joined JBS, what does that say of your statement above? Attending Oxford does not make you smarter than anyone else. Take Oxford flunky Bill Clinton. What was that lame excuse he tried to use to squirm out of the Lewinski scandal: "It depends on your definiton of what "is" is." Oxford scholars are just given gushy jobs by their connections but that doesn't make them highly intelligent. They may be good flowers sniffers but any average gardner can whip their little tails in the flower sniffing department. I met an Arizona man, no he wasn't a mountainman, who confided in me about his narrow escape from the clutches of the Oxfordian internationalists. He became a member of The John Birch Society and is forever grateful to The JBS for persuading him to realize that his intellect, talent and energy would for certain be perverted for the cause of evil had he attended Oxford on his scholarship.

report abuse vote down vote up

February 03, 2010
Votes: +3

Apologist said:

Technicality So, you don't actually have to be a member to post on this site. You don't have to join John Birch. You don't have to agree with John Birch. You don't even have to know who John Birch was (is?). You don't even have to have any level of paranoia or belief in conspiracy theories. In fact, any person capable of reading and using a keyboard can post (I realize those 2 skills may be a stretch for some John Birch members). Maybe, if you folks are paranoid about the New World Order or One World Government or whatever you are calling it this decade, you should make your site private. But then, that wouldn't be in accordance with the fundamental democratic values you hold so dear, would it? What a dilemma. Perhaps you can ask your Arizona mountain man.

report abuse vote down vote up

February 03, 2010
Votes: -4

Lee Gonzales said:

Oxford joe is paranoid of the facts Do you think that a world government under the control of an small cabal is something that you would favor? Kisinger isn't shy aout calling it a NWO. http://www.nytimes.com/2009/01/12/opinion/12iht-edkissinger.1.19281915.html?pagewanted=2&_r=1 Z-big brother tells us Between Two Ages that Marx was great and the USA is out-dated. He brags in his book: "national sovereignty is no longer a viable concept." According to Brzezinski, U.S. sovereignty should be jettisoned for "the goal of world government." He also contended, in the same book, that "Marxism, disseminated on the popular level in the form of Communism, represented a major advance in man's ability to conceptualize his relationship to his world" and that "Marxism supplied the best available insight into contemporary reality." Maybe if the US chamber of Commerce read what this Obama advisor said about Marx and US sovereignty they too would be a litle paranoid?

report abuse vote down vote up

February 03, 2010
Votes: +3

Lee Gonzales said:

apologist " You don't even have to know who John Birch was (is?)." That's right apologist, even trolls like you can post. "You don't even have to have any level of paranoia or belief in conspiracy theories." That's right apologist,you can just go about your silly day ignoring statements from the Insiders when they speak about the New World Order:http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4bKwH3kJew4 Yea, apologist, go ask Charlie Rose what Henry meant by all that talk concerning The New World Order. "In fact, any person capable of reading and using a keyboard can post (I realize those 2 skills may be a stretch for some John Birch members)." Is that an attempt at humor or did you have something else in mind when you identified yourself as a silly talking troll? "Maybe, if you folks are paranoid about the New World Order or One World Government or whatever you are calling it this decade, you should make your site private." I don't know about that. Then we wouldn't get a kick out of nutty guys like you posting your silly remarks.

report abuse vote down vote up

February 03, 2010
Votes: +3

realtorgal said:

	Trolls at this site The poster who uses the moniker "apologist" is an troll. There are no doubt more and perhaps even "conspiring" as bratty children are apt to do whenever adults are not around.
	report abuse vote down vote up

February 03, 2010
Votes: +0

realtorgal said:

	Oxford joe should call himself soothsayer Joe He can tell everything about anyone by just a glance at his crystal ball.
	report abuse vote down vote up

February 03, 2010
Votes: +1

Libertyprevails said:

Reality NOT conspiracy theory...... How can it be a conspiracy theory when the plans for New World Order/One World Government are posted on the United Nations website??? If you are paying attention, they openly discuss it as if it's a good thing. People need to take off their rose colored glasses and wake the hell up. Copenhagen was no "conspiracy theory". It WOULD have taken sovereignty as a Nation and made our Constitution no better than toilet paper. The Rhodes Society is just ONE of the MANY groups of elites that want a Global Government, another term that is thrown around frequently today. We, the conspiracy theorists, are the ones that STOPPED THE AGW HOAX. We, the conspiracy theorists, have been exposing this *cough* health care bill as the unconstitutional, socialistic take over of the American Economy, that it is. We, the conspiracy theorists, are doing the job that CONGRESS SHOULD HAVE DONE, by calling out this Usurping President whom has NO ALLEGIANCE to our Country. Show me his American daddy and I'll call him President, till then, he is just another mess we "conspiracy theorists" will have to clean up. We, the conspiracy theorists, warned you that the H1N1 was a hoax that they were blowing out of proportion to force vaccinations. The "nasal spray" they pushed onto our children and pregnant mothers and then later revealed that it was the live virus. I could go on but I think you get the hint.....Next time just say Thank You and save your rhetoric for your liberal buddies....they seem to like it.

report abuse vote down vote up

February 04, 2010
Votes: +1

Lee Gonzales said:

	The trolls are coming out from behind the walls Trolls: "Open source" and "apologist" two very misguided people. They don't have the intellect to debate. One of the poor wretched creatures imagines that he drives past an "insane asylum." Deinstitutionalization which began in the 1970's has left few state mental institutions open. Just be careful and don't take any wooden nickels.
	report abuse vote down vote up

February 04, 2010
Votes: +1

RP said:

	Who was Cecil Rhodes? Cecil Rhodes wanted to breed an American elite of philosopher-kings. There is a bit more to it than that, but essentially he wanted a British-based white super-power to rule the world... with elites such as himself at the top. 'nuff said.
	report abuse vote down vote up

February 04, 2010
Votes: +0

DDW said:

I sure wouldn't waste any more time on blind fools with darkened mentalities like "open source" and "apologist". They're completely ignorant. Not only that, I have a feeling the time is fast approaching when we're going to find out just who's wrong and just who's right. Perhaps these fools think that by being soft with regard to the enemy that they will be treated better by the enemy. They have a horrible surprise awaiting them if that's what they think.

report abuse vote down vote up

February 04, 2010
Votes: +0

Open Source said:

Admission of defeat. Y'all are right. I give in. I am an agent of the worldwide conspiracy to take your guns (in fact, I am typing this by Blackberry from my black helicopter right now). You are so perceptive in figuring out that whenever people use the words "New", "World", and "Order", they are automatically referring to the precise paranoid way in which you understand those terms to be defined. Remarkable that I couldn't see that earlier. And do you know what it was that convinced me? It was your excellent rhetoric, coupled with your seemingly random CAPITALISATION of words mixed with delightful speling errars. It's a very professional message you guys are putting out here. The troll that calls himself "Libertyprevails" deserves an outstanding achievement award in this area. And with that, I'll let you put your aluminum foil hats back on, and allow you to focus your attention entirely on Fox News for the rest of the day.

report abuse vote down vote up

February 04, 2010
Votes: +0

Lee Gonzales said:

	paging nurse, Ratched "Nurse Ratched, Calling, Nurse Ratched, there is an inmate that uses the monikers apologist' and 'Opensource' that has jumped the chain link fence. He's easy to spot. He is wearing a bennie hat lined with aluminum foil and is carrying a Blackberry. We are going to ignore him. About 10,00 c.c's of Fluoxetine should calm him ."
	report abuse vote down vote up

February 04, 2010
Votes: +1

RP said:

It isn't the JBS who invented the term "new world order" "We are not going to achieve a new world order without paying for it in blood as well as in words and money." Arthur Schlesinger, Jr., in Foreign Affairs (July/August 1995) "No one will enter the New World Order unless he or she will make a pledge to worship Lucifer. No one will enter the New Age unless he will take a Luciferian Initiation." David Spangler, Director of Planetary Initiative, United Nations "The world can therefore seize the opportunity [Persian Gulf crisis] to fulfill the long-held promise of a New World Order where diverse nations are drawn together in common cause to achieve the universal aspirations of mankind." George Herbert Walker Bush "The New World Order will have to be built from the bottom up rather than from the top down...but in the end run around national sovereignty, eroding it piece by piece will accomplish much more than the old fashioned frontal assault." CFR member Richard Gardner, writing in the April l974 issue of the CFRs journal, Foreign Affairs. "The old world order changed when this war-storm broke. The old international order passed away as suddenly, as unexpectedly, and as completely as if it had been wiped out by a gigantic flood, by a great tempest, or by a volcanic eruption. The old world order died with the setting of that days sun and a new world order is being born while I speak, with birth-pangs so terrible that it seems almost incredible that life could come out of such fearful suffering and such overwhelming sorrow." Nicholas Murray Butler, in an address delivered before the Union League of Philadelphia, Nov. 27, 1915 ... and many more quotes from Insiders. But I guess Open Source missed all that. BTW, "black helicopters" were discredited by the JBS several years ago.

report abuse vote down vote up

February 04, 2010
Votes: +0

DDW said:

	Here Is what God's word has to say about people like "Oxford Joe", "Apologist" and "Open Source": Though thou shouldest bray a fool in a mortar among wheat with a pestle, yet will not his foolishness depart from him. Proverbs 27:22
	report abuse vote down vote up

February 04, 2010
Votes: +0

rprew said:

A genuine admission of defeat... ... is when you lack any argument consisting of facts to support your position and need to resort to ridicule and name calling. I "Admission of Defeat" that Open Source has facetiously posted contains no facts but does contain elements of both name calling a pathetic attempt at ridicule. Even in that department, the facts merely the echoing of what he hears from MSNBC, the NY Times, and others of that ilk. I would also like to point out that Fox News Channel, which Open Source falsely believes to be adored by constitutionists, is only slightly less obnoxious that the others. If Open Source had any knowledge of facts, such nonsense would never have been alluded to by same.

report abuse vote down vote up

February 04, 2010
Votes: +0

Open Source said:

... RP, my point is more than you give it credit for. My point is this: I happily acknowledge that lots of people around the world happen to use the words "New", "World", and "Order". What I have a problem with - is the notion that every time someone uses those words, wherever they are in the world, whatever their political/economic beliefs, whatever their language, whatever their religion, etc - that every time someone uses those words they intend them to have the same meaning as each other, & that that same meaning is the exact meaning that the JBS conspiracy theories attribute to that phrase. I can say "Man, I want a new world order in horse-racing to throw out corrupt gamblers" or "Man, we need a new world order at NBC's comedy division - those guys are fools", for example, but neither of those things mean I want to call in the ridiculous fictional one-world-government to take away your precious guns and the Constitution. You should be much more critical. It's not me who's being naive. Speaking of which, DDW, why is it relevant what Psalms (or any other piece of ancient fiction) says about anything? I'll let you get back to reading the New York Times now.

report abuse vote down vote up

February 05, 2010
Votes: +0

RP said:

LOL! Definitely NOT a Rhodes scholar! I can say "Man, I want a new world order in horse-racing to throw out corrupt gamblers" or "Man, we need a new world order at NBC's comedy division - those guys are fools", for example, but neither of those things mean I want to call in the ridiculous fictional one-world-government to take away your precious guns and the Constitution. - Open Source WOW! With a routine like that, you should be on Comedy Central! Your lame "argument" is ludicrously unskilled! I am in awe of your naïveté. It is certain the NY Times would give you rave reviews. The only point you have made obvious is the one under your hat. I shall be looking forward to the posting of your next daunting performance, provided you find the time to break away from your racing form.

report abuse vote down vote up

February 05, 2010
Votes: +1

Opened Source said:

	... Nice one, dude. But you didn't actually answer the argument. Why should we assume that everyone who uses the term "new world order" means: (a) the same thing as each other; and (b) the same thing as you JBS folks mean. Try again, hotshot.
	report abuse vote down vote up

February 05, 2010
Votes: -1

DDW said:

The Bible Is it really fiction, Open Source? Or are you a fool? The fool hath said in his heart, There is no God. Psalm 14:1, Psalm 53:1 God's word says you're a fool and that's plenty good enough for me, so just babble on. Quite frankly, I really don't see why these intelligent people are wasting their time and effort arguing with a fool like you. But then again, that brings us right back to Psalm 27:22.

report abuse vote down vote up

February 05, 2010
Votes: +1

RP said:

... Open Sore - a) and b) have already been answered. You keep missing it. Either you don't WANT to learn, in which case DDW is correct and you are a fool, or you can't learn, in which case you are wasting your time and ours. You must have a phobia. Which is it: alethophobia or sophophobia? Message to DDW: I know it's cruel, but sometimes it's fun to go to the zoo and tap on the glass or rattle the cages! I am greatly entertained by the reactions.

report abuse vote down vote up

February 06, 2010
Votes: +1

DDW said:

	RP Message received and understood. Thank you.
	report abuse vote down vote up

February 06, 2010
Votes: +1

Lee Gonzales said:

	Which user name is it,Open Source... Opened source,open sauce.How many aliases do you use?
	report abuse vote down vote up

February 08, 2010
Votes: +0

Opened Sauce said:

... So this is what it's come to, Mr Gonzalez? You asking about my username? Naturally you haven't answered the argument. Why should we assume that everyone who uses the term "new world order" means: (a) the same thing as each other; and (b) the same thing as you JBS folks mean. Until and unless JBS explains this, your theories are as hollow as that last comment of yours. I won't be holding my breath.

report abuse vote down vote up

February 09, 2010
Votes: +1

Opened Sauce said:

	... PS: My other aliases include Jacques Chirac, Tony Blair, and Stephen Harper. Yes, that's right, remember that I'm a paid employee of the Cabal. I can only leave brief comments due to my rigorous schedule of black-helicopter-piloting and gold-standard-undermining. It's a busy life.
	report abuse vote down vote up

February 09, 2010
Votes: +2