Delighted with the opportunities she believes are presented by the prospect of working with America’s new president, German Chancellor Angela Merkel has urged Obama to take a multilateral approach in tackling the world’s problems that would fit right in with her global elitist agenda.

Apparently, Merkel wants Obama to be not only President of the United States, but she also wants him as an international partner in furthering globalization, hoping to be consulted before decisions are made. “I hope our cooperation will be characterized by listening to one another and taking decisions on the basis that any one country can’t solve the world’s problems on its own, but that we can only do it together,” she said on the morning of the presidential inauguration.

That sentiment is a carbon-copy of the one used by Frank-Walter Steinmeier, the German Foreign Minister, in an open letter he supposedly penned to Barack Obama eight days earlier: “No country in the world, even the most powerful, can solve even one of these problems alone,” he wrote  speaking of the world’s present ills, from global economics to global disarmament.

Merkel has been a strong proponent of the EU, and ultimately one world government, for quite some time. Working to create a framework that would ensure complete gobalization, she sought first the entrapment of all European countries in the EU by practically forcing the passage of the EU Constitution on European countries when she was the EU President.

She is also a supporter of what she calls the “liberalisation” of trade. This involves the creation of a Trans-Atlantic Free-Trade zone that would see joint financial market regulations, stock exchange rules, intellectual-property rights, and mutual recognition of technical standards being shared by the EU and the United States. Such a move would tend to place the U.S. at the mercy of EU bureaucrats and would be a substantial blow to American sovereignty and independence.

Given this background, just what multilateral approach does she want Obama to take? Well, Merkel didn’t hold anything back on last week, telling the world in no uncertain terms that she wants:

The United States of America ceding part of its own sovereignty to international organizations when it comes to international treaties. That means agreeing to international rules for the financial markets.

Merkel would have the United States of America lose its sovereignty and submit to the dictates of the New World Order, pronto. If it happens, along with it will come all the horrors of the climate controllers agenda, socialized medicine, expanding war in the Middle East, submission to decisions of international courts, financial control by globalists — the absolute end of the Constitution and freedom our forefathers worked at great cost to establish.

Will Merkel get the cooperation out of Obama she is looking for? Probably, if his visit to Germany last July was any indication. He used all the correct globalist terminology and buzz words as he whipped the crowd up into a cult of personality frenzy.
 
To see the whole frightening scenario all spelled out, take a look at Steinmeier’s entire letter to Obama and then read between the lines of Merkel’s 2007 address in the German Bundestag — there’s not much left for the imagination as to what the goal is.

TrackBack URI for this entry

Comments (4)

Subscribe to this comment's feed

Show/Hide comments

Pat Henry said:

War is Peace, Free is Regulated No doubt these trans-atlantic plans will be misnamed "Free Trade" since that was successful rhetoric within the Americas. But regulation is the antithesis of truly free. Many are enamored with the "free trade" idea. But I have consistently reminded Congressmen in my letters to them that REGULATED trade is NOT free trade, despite the name. Thanks to the John Birch Society, and the excellent research and presentation in The New American for making me aware of this, and giving me tools to communicate to the real heart of the issue. Help pull the curtain on Oz.

report abuse vote down vote up

January 26, 2009
Votes: +3

GaryRLewis said:

	Continental Congress (not the Con-Con) Please view the following link, very important http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OBxTySY-Pzg&eurl=http://www.restoretherepublic.com/category/take-action
	report abuse vote down vote up

January 26, 2009
Votes: +0

danwhitehead1 said:

	Two world wars - - - - - - and Germany's at it again!!! Incredible.
	report abuse vote down vote up

January 26, 2009
Votes: +1

MarkGlen said:

	Germany, the troublemaker I have thought that the man of sin would come from Germany. Why is Germany always the leading troublemaker of Europe? That mind set is puzzling.
	report abuse vote down vote up

January 29, 2009 | url
Votes: +0