Comments for Congress Meddling in NFL Business at http://jbs.org , comment 1 to 8 out of 8 comments http://jbs.org Sat, 20 Mar 2010 23:35:40 +0100 FeedCreator 1.7.3 http://jbs.org/jbs-news-feed/5565-congress-meddling-in-nfl-business#comment-2874 Someone's coffee must be COLD! The comment titled *WTF* is totally irrelevant to the article. What on EARTH does racisim have to do with a power hungry government meddling in affairs of private companys??? RACISIM???? Try using a dictionary next time. If a person has a negative comment, that is fine, but getting foul-mouthed and shouting slanderous untruths at others is totaly uncalled for! - watchdog Thu, 05 Nov 2009 08:48:01 +0100 http://jbs.org/jbs-news-feed/5565-congress-meddling-in-nfl-business#comment-2808 Still exist? - DDW Mon, 02 Nov 2009 10:50:46 +0100 http://jbs.org/jbs-news-feed/5565-congress-meddling-in-nfl-business#comment-2798 One giant loophole in our Constitution is the phrase "general welfare." Of course , it become a "loophole" when common sense is discarded by modern day revisionists. The original intentions and meanings of the Framers are there for all to read and understand. The current allowance from the Fourteenth Amendment to those sneaking into this country hours before giving birth says it all. Again, common sense! - Jim Bowman Jr. Sun, 01 Nov 2009 05:12:08 +0100 http://jbs.org/jbs-news-feed/5565-congress-meddling-in-nfl-business#comment-2795 I thought it was the first ten amendments, the Bill of Rights, that caused all the controversy because the Founding Fathers thought the Constitution was clear enough and that the adding of the first ten amendments would create loopholes. - DDW Sun, 01 Nov 2009 04:17:20 +0100 http://jbs.org/jbs-news-feed/5565-congress-meddling-in-nfl-business#comment-2791 Gee, I wonder if we, the taxpayers, could get a look at the medical records of our Congressmen and Senators? Now that would be revealing. - Still Free Sat, 31 Oct 2009 10:46:15 +0100 http://jbs.org/jbs-news-feed/5565-congress-meddling-in-nfl-business#comment-2784 There were a number of notable people who worked against ratification of the Constitution. George Mason, Elbridge Gerry, Patrick Henry, George Clinton... just to name a couple. They were very afraid the the proposed Constitution would open the cage door to restriction of government power. If you haven't already, obtain and read "The Anti-Federalist Papers and the Constitutional Convention Debates". Do not misunderstand me... our Constitution is a wonderful document and served us well, until usurpers eventually made it essentially irrelevant. It is useful to understand our history... all of it. - RP Fri, 30 Oct 2009 13:08:32 +0100 http://jbs.org/jbs-news-feed/5565-congress-meddling-in-nfl-business#comment-2781 A snooping, prying, meddling, out-of-conrol rogue government proves beyond a shadow of a doubt the it needs immediate and severe trimming and to be put back into its proper Constitutional box (and by any means necessary!!). I still say that it looks like the antifederalists were right all along. - DDW Fri, 30 Oct 2009 11:58:43 +0100 http://jbs.org/jbs-news-feed/5565-congress-meddling-in-nfl-business#comment-2780 Somehow, I just can't see the Founding Fathers having any thoughts of government oversight of cricket or horse racing. If football or baseball had existed in the 18th century, I don't imagine that the Continental Congresses, or the Congress of the Confederation, or the early Congresses of the United States would have felt any inclination or obligation, or even justification, for involvement in overseeing these activities. Government is spiraling out of control, spending is spiraling out of control, the economy is in a shambles, we are involved in several wars, the future of the Republic is in question, and these idiots in Washington are worried about football? Somebody call the asylum! All the lunatics have ESCAPED! - RP Fri, 30 Oct 2009 10:49:26 +0100