<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!-- generator="FeedCreator 1.7.3" -->
<rss version="2.0">
	<channel>
		<title>Firefighters' Reverse Discrimination Case</title>
		<description>Comments for Firefighters' Reverse Discrimination Case at http://jbs.org , comment 1 to 1 out of 1 comments</description>
		<link>http://jbs.org</link>
		<lastBuildDate>Thu, 18 Mar 2010 13:04:43 +0100</lastBuildDate>
        <generator>FeedCreator 1.7.3</generator>
		<item>
			<title>Reverse?</title>
			<link>http://jbs.org/jbs-news-feed/5067#comment-1519</link>
			<description>I've always wondered, just exactly what is &quot;reverse&quot; discrimination?  I dare say that seems to be an oxymoron.  Discrimination is discrimination.  Period.  Using the line of reasoning that came up with &quot;reverse&quot; discrimination, I wonder if a soiled piece of toilet paper could be called &quot;reverse&quot; clean or &quot;reverse&quot; dirty? - danwhitehead1</description>
			<pubDate>Wed, 08 Jul 2009 13:54:50 +0100</pubDate>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
