Comments for Berg v. Obama v. Reality at http://jbs.org , comment 1 to 32 out of 20 comments http://jbs.org Sat, 20 Mar 2010 06:22:58 +0100 FeedCreator 1.7.3 http://jbs.org/us-constitution-blog/4196#comment-201 You are correct: Congress is the key! Check out www.GOOOH.com. They have a plan to replace all 435 members of the U.S. House of Representatives with true representatives of the people. The time for change is now! Check out GOOOH. - TP Sat, 27 Dec 2008 09:32:05 +0100 http://jbs.org/us-constitution-blog/4196#comment-157 Folks, there is a much simpler way. If Obama is trying to become president using a false document, that is a crime. Civil suits don't help in that case -- you just get told that you don't have standing. Mr. Berg and others, turn your evidence over to the criminal justice system. If you are right, those people have the power and the expertise to bring this to a swift conclusion. If you can't find a prosecutor to pursue the case, then maybe it isn't as open-and-shut as you think it is. - MaineSkeptic Thu, 18 Dec 2008 07:50:53 +0100 http://jbs.org/us-constitution-blog/4196#comment-137 You got the last bit right, but the rest? Leave for where?? If this country goes there will no place left. Half of your suggestions already belong to the enemy. Why all this panic over Obama? These guys have controlled the Presidency (both parties) for most of century. Do you think that another Neocon would do anything much differnent? It's time to forget the Persidency and go to work where the action is, in the Congerssional districts. Otherwise there will be no place to run. Even if we do loose why run? Who wants to live like that. Shouldn't we all be saying "Give me Liberty or Give Me Death!" You all need to join us and help win this thing while we still can, and yes we still can. Or do you want to go and cower in the hills somewhere? - vholford Fri, 12 Dec 2008 15:41:02 +0100 http://jbs.org/us-constitution-blog/4196#comment-130 People of the U.S. of America.You should know by now what has happened to our government.It has been taken over by some one or some organization that no one knows.The writing is on the wall. First, a black man,comes out of no where with no credentials,and wins the senate election in illinois,and then becomes president of the U.S. of America all within a period of less then 4 years.Second,Certain people have caught up with some of his fraudulent doings and have taken them as far as the SCOTUS and it gets covered up immediately. We have been conned by our own government.My God ,what does it take for you idiots to see this.Leave this country and head for ,canada,mexico,or any place where you can protect your families.We will be fighting for our lives in a short period of time.ITS TIME TO LEAVE OR BAND TOGETHER - gaetano Wed, 10 Dec 2008 05:38:26 +0100 http://jbs.org/us-constitution-blog/4196#comment-93 According to a contact who is in touch with Keyes, the government is terrifed, has requested troops back home, and asked the media to keep the lid on for now. Violence will ruin our process even more. We need to find all legal channels at this point to find the truth. What divides us from Communism and terroist regimes is the willingness to use all legal and peaceful and Constitutional means. I really hope the courts can overlook legal technicalities and find reason to hear some of these suits.It is very clear the certifiers did not investigate and some states claim it's not their job to investigate. So I wrote Diane Feinstein asking if there are some laws that are needed regarding more stringent rules for certification. - Sharon Reynolds Fri, 05 Dec 2008 17:52:46 +0100 http://jbs.org/us-constitution-blog/4196#comment-92 Sorry for typos. This keyboard is sticky or something! My daughter is coordiantor for San Bdo Cnty National and global day of prayer, goes to city counsel meetings and leads prayer, and is working with pastors and the House of prayer over here. She informs me that athiests are suing the city because a billboard company took down a sign by athiests. It says "What if there were no religeon?" People called and complained. I knpow of a country where they threw God out. They are responsible for the death of 100,000,000 world wide. Obama's mom was a communist. Her father was kicked out of the states. She is the subject in vile pornography writing of Frank Davis her father's Communist friend. He got Obama into drugs. Maybe Obama was traveling in Pakistan as a drug emmissary. Some homosexuals in Chicago said he was the biggest dealer there. The Alqeda is a drug cartel too. We really have no clue who this guy is. He seems likeable but I could not figure why people are willing to risk someone who has so little background. - Sharon Reynolds Fri, 05 Dec 2008 17:23:44 +0100 http://jbs.org/us-constitution-blog/4196#comment-91 How any one can think Obama proved something by putting it the net or Fact Check is really un informed. Fact Check is Annenberg foundation which Obama funneled millions to for Ayers "alternative "Marxist" schools! The fact is everyone "just assumed" he was eligeable when he simply signed a form saying he was. He, if not a natural born citizen for any reason (especially because there are documents showing as Indonesian Citizen)is resisting showing full record of birth, passports, school records. The suggestion that an electore or two or three should withold is great. One of my daughters acquaintances is an eletor. I will see what we might do. Two of Alan Keys filing partners are electore are they not? I did write Diane Feinstein. Do what you can peple. He has spent almost a million in attorenys to oppose standing and fiek dismissals. Seems like theres a rat in the basment somewhere. - Sharon Reynolds Fri, 05 Dec 2008 17:11:26 +0100 http://jbs.org/us-constitution-blog/4196#comment-89 The SCOTUS has NOT made a decision, It takes 4 judges on the SCOTUS to approve the writ of cert. I believe this will happen. This is a constitutional issue so it is extremely important. I do not believe the SCOTUS will let this slide. Factcheck is in the tank and what they posted proves NOT A THING!!! neither does fighththesmears. 1961 in Hawaii even foreign born children could get a registration of live birth certificate if registered within the year of birth. Most likely this is the case with Obama. The real vaulted certificate has been fought by the Obama lawyers to remain a secret. The governor of Hawaii has said that he does have a certificate but explains nothing. In the case Berg v Obama Berg clearly states that this is a certificate but does not prove natural birth unless there is signature by attending physician, Hospital record with name of mother, his name, footprint of child and a seal. There still remains questions to why? and what is he trying to hide? I believe with now 17 suits in process they will get a true answer. I hope so and I hope there is nothing to this. We vote again in 2012 and if he proves to not be a good president we vote him out. If he does we reelect him. But no one is above the constitution nor should he be. - danney Fri, 05 Dec 2008 15:24:29 +0100 http://jbs.org/us-constitution-blog/4196#comment-80 Let the Supreme Court kill itself by declaring Obama President and piss off millions of gun toting Patriots. Go ahead Supremes, make my day. - beijingyank Thu, 04 Dec 2008 10:08:27 +0100 http://jbs.org/us-constitution-blog/4196#comment-78 Dec 1st has come and gone with no SOTUS action Dec 5th will come and go with no SOTUS action Dec 15th the electors will meet and elect Barack Obama Jan 8th the result will be announced Jan 20th will be the inauguration Jan 20th 2008 until November 4th, 2012 Obama serves ably as president and is reelected, with about the same number of electoral votes as before Have none of you even looked at the factcheck.org material? It's totally clear that Obama has proven he was born in the USA. Unless, that is, you think there's a conspiracy between Obama and the Republican governor of Hawaii to hide material, unless you think Obama's parents put a birth announcement in the paper to hide his true birth place 47 years ago, unless you believe all the government workers who have access to Obama's documentation are conspiring to hide his dirty secret... Can't you just face the fact the he's been elected president? I should have invested money in companies that make tin foil hats so they could sell them to you all. - skipperdog Thu, 04 Dec 2008 09:07:47 +0100 http://jbs.org/us-constitution-blog/4196#comment-74 The US Supreme Court Conference on Dec 5th (and/or Keyes' case) will determine whether there IS or IS NOT, a Constitution or Bill of Rights. Here comes the 50/50 decision. If this case is decided moot, Let's get on with our own war since there is no law! - GodsModernDayMartyr Thu, 04 Dec 2008 00:09:10 +0100 http://jbs.org/us-constitution-blog/4196#comment-69 I accidentally bumped into the JBS just today. I was a person who was not politically aware when the brainwash and smear of this organization was taking place. But I am learning by leaps and bounds now because of the internet. I look forward to gaining valuable information on how to legally defeat this evil neocon antichrist monster. I will add that thru out history they have always been defeated and just like everyone else they don't learn from history. They are going down. - say it loud Tue, 02 Dec 2008 13:25:18 +0100 http://jbs.org/us-constitution-blog/4196#comment-53 Sorry, my vague point is that we may be forfeiting our legal election process to a free wheeling Auto de fe. Are we giving up the established rule of law regarding an electable candidate and turning it over to the immediate whims of a faceless mob, driven through a biased media? If no one running is held accountable to the current standards and rules, are we not entering into political chaos? The Auto de fe was mob justice without rules, an errant judicial spin off from a traditional legal trial, with a persons success or guilt based solely on their character. I want a candidate to follow the current election rules, or to change them legally before entering an election, not to create a modern day, free wheeling Auto de fe. - G.E.Aylesworth Thu, 27 Nov 2008 05:56:30 +0100 http://jbs.org/us-constitution-blog/4196#comment-44 Thank you for the history lesson. No one appreciates history more than a student of history. However, I appreciate clarity too. What are you talking about? - archtoplee Wed, 26 Nov 2008 06:21:11 +0100 http://jbs.org/us-constitution-blog/4196#comment-41 "Auto de fe" is an old descriptive word I've dusted off that Obama supporters or critics may use. The phrase auto de fe refers to the ritual of public penance of condemned heretics and apostates that took place when the Spanish Inquisition or the Portuguese Inquisition had decided their punishment (that is, after the trial). Auto de fe in medieval Spanish (and in Portuguese) means "act of faith". The phrase also commonly occurs in English in its alternative Portuguese form auto-da-fé. In the popular imagination "auto-da-fé" has come to refer to burning at the stake for heresy. Specifically this term came to being around 1500 as Queen Isabella forced the last Muslims out of Granada in southern Spain. An Auto De Fe was the trial of someone condemned of heresy. During this trial or "inquisition" the unmasked victim was questioned by their accusers whom wore hoods to hide their identities. I think this term works well when a political candidate is anonymously destroyed or supported through the media, or blogged out or into existence in the faceless realm of the internet. - G.E.Aylesworth Tue, 25 Nov 2008 23:15:27 +0100 http://jbs.org/us-constitution-blog/4196#comment-39 Mr. Whedon, you've obviously run out of arguments so you use this forum to vent your anger against an organization that has been out there exposing the Wm Clinton Chinagate scandal, the Oklahoma city coverup, the Foreknowldege that our government had about 9-11. Those are just three examples that prove that the JBS isn't afraid of exposing lies and coverup. Pick up your telephone and call your Senator and Congressman and report back on what they told you. If they stonewall you then you accuse them of "plugging their throats," but don't attack an organization that has been out there fighting to keep the NWO from repacing our Constitution with the North American Union! How many trips did you make to the state capitol to stop the NAU? - Lee Gonzales Tue, 25 Nov 2008 20:47:44 +0100 http://jbs.org/us-constitution-blog/4196#comment-37 Yes, where is our major media? Answer: doing their jobs as corporate newslettters. The same corporate state that offered the world Obama, decides what goes in your TV and mailbox as "news." You would think that somewhere out there there should be an approved mainstream journalist willing to commit career suicide and put the question to our pending Dear Leader. But, as there has been no such journalist willing to ask President Bush where his declaration of war from Congress is to keep combat operations going in Iraq or Afghanistan, don't hold your breath for the Obama citizenship question. - capo Tue, 25 Nov 2008 14:03:50 +0100 http://jbs.org/us-constitution-blog/4196#comment-30 First of all, I must agree with those who wonder why The Barack doesn't just shut this whole controversy down with an attested vault certificate. The actions of the State of Hawaii raises further questions, but the important one to me, is the one that will be decided before Justice Clarence Thomas on December 5. Which raises the larger question: Is it not the duty of our much-vaunted "media" to keep us informed? If so, then why is this entire political debacle only known to a tiny fraction of the populace (growing, of course, virally)? Well, ABC, CBS, NBC, CNN, FOX??? I've written to all of them and have not received even the whisper of a reply. This thing is BIG!!! What's stopping you? I note that BO Plenty had plenty of money to play with. More than a half Billion dollars, I understand. Could it be that some of Daddy WarBarack's rolls of cash are keeping your throats plugged? Bill Whedon - Bill Whedon Tue, 25 Nov 2008 09:20:12 +0100 http://jbs.org/us-constitution-blog/4196#comment-28 Jim, There are those like yourself that appreciate organization and deal in facts. Then at the other extreme are those who operate on what they emotionally perceive as the way they want things organized. Without examining the facts, they allow themselves to be driven by uneducated, or biased media rumor and speculation. Fair media would give us what, where, when and why, then and let us make our own decisions. Perhaps this country needs a Media Liberation Party. Adman to the Stars - G.E.Aylesworth Tue, 25 Nov 2008 08:26:44 +0100 http://jbs.org/us-constitution-blog/4196#comment-25 An elector pledged to Barack Obama living in a state that requires by law that he can vote no other way, or be fined for voting another way, would have standing to bring a lawsuit against that state, its Democrat Party or Barack Obama for putting him in the position of having to vote for someone he is not sure of being a qualified candidate. The elector could claim that he is being forced into a position of becoming liable for a lawsuit against himself for failing to faithfully carry out his duties as a member of the Electoral College. - Jim Capo Tue, 25 Nov 2008 06:26:06 +0100